• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Infantry of Tomorrow

They had the MGS. It did what the Booker was supposed to but on wheels. Most of them did work. It still wasn't a hero. It's a funny thing, but a light to medium direct fire vehicle should have some merit to it but in the end it innately doesn't. I've come to the conclusion that the right direct fire support vehicle for dismounted troops is the tank.
I was more thinking for the Bradley formations etc - the Abrams was a little overkill for Iraq.

Dismounts had Javelins and AH-64’s ;)

No. But only as it's aging out and doesn't hold a full section. I think the solution is an IFV for "armoured infantry," a Senator-like battle taxi vehicle for "mech infantry" and a ISVF for specialized "light infantry."

🍻
I’m of the option a 40-50ton Tracked IFV is what you work with Tanks for. That is Mech Infantry, perhaps a tracked taxi is needed as well, but I’m not convinced.

The 15-20t LAV 2.0 systems are your Motorized Infantry - these are the Light Armor systems for NEO etc tasks. They aren’t needed in mass - just for QRF stuff for your JFE/NEO/DART.
Its a very light bus, designed to get one from A to B and back in a lower threat environment than what you would need an ABCT for


Then you have Light Mobility assistance- which is the GM LUV down thru the ATV’s.

I’d put BV-206 type things in with that as well.
As its mobility assistance, not a vehicle to fight from.
 
The 15-20t LAV 2.0 systems are your Motorized Infantry - these are the Light Armor systems for NEO etc tasks. They aren’t needed in mass - just for QRF stuff for your JFE/NEO/DART.
Its a very light bus, designed to get one from A to B and back in a lower threat environment than what you would need an ABCT for
I used to be dead set against the converted truck, Senator type vehicles. I thought the Grizzley, Bisson and Stryker as adequate but getting pricy. What I want now is the following.

To an extent when I look at the middle fleet, I want: a) lots of them - use them everywhere as troop, cargo and SEV versions (armoured infantry IFVs and light infantry ISV are niche specialized roles - for the middle I want a general purpose fleet that spans the entire gap in between except for heavier logistics vehicles) they don't all need to be armoured but need the same chassis; b) to have lots of them you need low cost; c) provide enough armour against small arms and splinters but keep them light; d) ease of maintenance and parts supply - easy to fix, the Model-T of the army; e) easy to operate - if you can drive a pickup truck, you can drive one and all of these things; and f) local development, manufacture and factory level support on a continuous-build, not burst, basis.

I'm starting to think that Senator can fill that bill. Is it the best of class? Who knows, there are far too many out there and they change daily but it certainly seems good enough to meet my requirements and can grow to meet new needs.

My vision for the 2.0% army or 3.5% army is to: a) build an armoured force using tracked tanks, IFVs and SPs through GDLS on a continuous-build basis; b) relegate existing LAVs to a secondary armoured training force but let the fleet slowly shrink and age out; c) develop a light quick reaction force through purchases of ISVs and specialized tracked and wheeled light vehicles (these could be foreign sales or locally manufactured but in relatively small scale); d) fill out the rest of the force using the continuous-build middle fleet through Roshel; and e) task a third Canadian manufacturer to continuous-build the entire logistics fleet.

🍻
 
That is a Marine Corps tank. The tank is was attached to the infantry in penny packets. By design.

Meanwhile - an alternate version of the infantry tank

1750182318270.png

A CUAS-Tank with an M230LF cannon (30x113) as supplied to the Thai Army. It goes where the infantry goes.

 
Just throwing this in here. The Senator even has a bunch of variants already designed and ready to go, even an electronic CUAS version. They can already pump out 120-140 per month.

 
Just throwing this in here, the Senator even has a bunch of variants already designed and ready to go. They can already pump out 120-140 per month.

Apparently they're also looking at how to integrate mortars into the things. Just for Senators, there are MRAPs, APCs, EOD variants, ambulances, anti-air and C-UAS. I expect a dedicated CP soon. Roshel certainly is ambitious.
 
Back
Top