KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 26,790
- Points
- 1,260
I was more thinking for the Bradley formations etc - the Abrams was a little overkill for Iraq.They had the MGS. It did what the Booker was supposed to but on wheels. Most of them did work. It still wasn't a hero. It's a funny thing, but a light to medium direct fire vehicle should have some merit to it but in the end it innately doesn't. I've come to the conclusion that the right direct fire support vehicle for dismounted troops is the tank.
Dismounts had Javelins and AH-64’s

I’m of the option a 40-50ton Tracked IFV is what you work with Tanks for. That is Mech Infantry, perhaps a tracked taxi is needed as well, but I’m not convinced.No. But only as it's aging out and doesn't hold a full section. I think the solution is an IFV for "armoured infantry," a Senator-like battle taxi vehicle for "mech infantry" and a ISVF for specialized "light infantry."
![]()
The 15-20t LAV 2.0 systems are your Motorized Infantry - these are the Light Armor systems for NEO etc tasks. They aren’t needed in mass - just for QRF stuff for your JFE/NEO/DART.
Its a very light bus, designed to get one from A to B and back in a lower threat environment than what you would need an ABCT for
Then you have Light Mobility assistance- which is the GM LUV down thru the ATV’s.
I’d put BV-206 type things in with that as well.
As its mobility assistance, not a vehicle to fight from.