- Reaction score
- 27,449
- Points
- 1,090
I'm not completely sure that you've got the right end of the horse, it might not be the mouth...
That's a campaign ad disguised as a message.
It would not surprise me if Singh's move is timed to piggyback off the popularity swing of the Harris/Walz campaign.
Or it could also be similar to union/labour sentiments of a similar look/feel ....Every political message is a campaign ad in disguise, but yes, he is campaigning. One phrase caught my attention "... when we stand united, we win ..."; sounds very similar to VP Harris' call of "when we fight, we win" ...
Every political message is a campaign ad in disguise, but yes, he is campaigning. One phrase caught my attention "... when we stand united, we win ..."; sounds very similar to VP Harris' call of "when we fight, we win". It would not surprise me if Singh's move is timed to piggyback off the popularity swing of the Harris/Walz campaign. It's an easy play to cast Poilievre in the Trump role and echo a similar narrative of 'saving democracy'.
If so, his timing is a bit off:
These pollsters were right in 2016 and 2020 - and they think Harris has already lost her mojo
By A.G. Gancarski
Published Sep. 3, 2024, 6:57 p.m. ET
Most polls show Vice President Kamala Harris leading in the swing states that will decide the election. But two Southern state pollsters are bucking the trend - and they’ve got former President Donald Trump up big.
The polling by InsiderAdvantage and Trafalgar in seven battleground states finds Trump on a path to 296 electoral votes - suggesting that Harris has already lost her momentum.
More at link . . .
I am surprised that Singh has actually, and finally, done this. I did not expect it. I would not be surprised, though, if this turns out to be a stunt and he finds a way to weasel out of it.
I am not surprised about the Harris/Walz trajectory. I fully expect them to flame out. Both have mounds of baggage, and no successes to hold up.
This is a Very Good News Day.
Singh pulled out of the agreement. He didn't say he was pulling the trigger on an election. Every confidence vote will be looked at on a case by case basis.reading between the lines, Singh was facing an armed revolt in caucus and polls showed that they were going nowhere but down as long as they were hitched to Trudeau. They are simply launching the lifeboats while they can.
The CPC will start introducing wedge issues, trying to split the progressive/left parties.So the NDP have abandoned the formal commitment but will go ‘vote by vote’ going forward. Not a super profound change in real terms, but it will give them more leverage to pressure the LPC on major policy planks. I still wouldn’t bank on an election in the short term, but unhitchhing themselves formally from LPC may bump their support. It definitely ups the pressure on Trudeau.
Interesting choice of spellings . . .damn
His pension is due in Feb, IIRC. That is less than six months away.Good points.
For now, though, I'm still leaning toward the money (and, if one were truly cynical, JS's pension) meaning no election soon. Still, I'd be happy to be proven wrong on this - I'm intrigued
Perhaps they'll call for a vote of no confidence. Then people will see whether Singh is willing to poop or get off the pot.The CPC will start introducing wedge issues, trying to split the progressive/left parties.
Assuming PP is suitably mindful of conditions for success, he’ll make sure it’s a vote with a labour/union nexus.Perhaps they'll call for a vote of no confidence. Then people will see whether Singh is willing to poop or get off the pot.
Still living in the same house but in separate bedrooms. Friends with benefits now.He cut the marriage as a means for expedient popularity.
Singh’s pension is a red herring. He’s in a very safe NDP riding and is in no danger of not being reelected.Perhaps they'll call for a vote of no confidence. Then people will see whether Singh is willing to poop or get off the pot.
Given the GoC just bargained with the unions that this would be part of their new contracts a lot of them just signed, then almost immediately walked it back, surprised they haven't taken them to court for bad faith negotiation.Can back to work legislation be put forth as a confidence vote? Surely there are some national strikes looming in federally regulated workplaces.
+10 on that.Given the GoC just bargained with the unions that this would be part of their new contracts a lot of them just signed, then almost immediately walked it back, surprised they haven't taken them to court for bad faith negotiation.
In practical terms, given that they also cut huge amounts of desks out so that the PS can't actually all come in 3 days a weeks (with military 5 days a week) and have somewhere to actually work out of is just weird. Last I checked the math, if you set the work week at M-F with core hours from 9-2 (allowing flex hours around that) you can't fit people into 40% of the space when they are in 60 or 100% of the time.+10 on that.
OK, you'll have to clarify for me.Singh’s pension is a red herring. He’s in a very safe NDP riding and is in no danger of not being reelected.