Joe Rogan and Pierre Poilievre interview

[Halifax Tar]

What you just saw was PP unfiltered through the CBC and other Canadian news outlets. He was always there, but filtered. The "narrative" will appear to not continue on this side of the border when that CBC filter is once again applied.

I don't disagree with you. But PP also seemed to make it a policy to talk to no one during the campaign.

By doing this he let the opposition (the media) dictate the tempo or narrative.

 

[Halifax Tar]

If you really think it's only the "CBC filter" that's in place re: how people perceive him (in spite of huge poll leads over PMJT right up until PMJT GTFO'ed), why did he appear with Archetypical CBC'ist Peter Mansbridge on his podcast? I await PP's appearance on a show like this ...

Curse of Politics | AQM

Politics. It's a blessing and a curse.

www.airquotesmedia.com

... where even though the host is a former Team Red operative, he would deal with PP both firmly AND with respect. Here's the interview the host did in the fall with PP's current campaign manager before he became campaign manager to give you a taste of how he deals with guests.

A tiny bit of interesting telegraphing by Outhouse in this interview, too, about how he might do things differently a fair bit before he got the job being the campaign XO.

Curse of Politics is a set group of folks, you mean

The Herle Burly

Podcast · Air Quotes Media · The Herle Burly podcast is a commotion of insights, arguments, opinions, and an impossibly loud laugh or two, hosted by David Herle.

open.spotify.com

 

[The Bread Guy]

Curse of Politics is a set group of folks, you mean

The Herle Burly

Podcast · Air Quotes Media · The Herle Burly podcast is a commotion of insights, arguments, opinions, and an impossibly loud laugh or two, hosted by David Herle.

open.spotify.com

My mistake: The Curse is the panel show, while “Herle Burly” is the one-on-one. Thanks!

 

[Halifax Tar]

My mistake: The Curse is the panel show, while “Herle Burly” is the one-on-one. Thanks!

No worries I am a fan of both.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

I felt he did a great job representing himself and Canada. His comment: "I won't criticize the Prime Minister on foreign soil" and how he describes his role as the leader of the Loyal Opposition speaks well of the Canadian system. I am sure that quite few Americans are confused about a system with some decorum still remaining. I think a big point of this interview is to reach the US public and help push Canada's case in regards to tariffs and other political issues.

 

[The Bread Guy]

Just moved all the bits on The Interview from the current gov't thread here since a new thread was started, and seems worth dissecting in detail.

Army.ca Staff

 

[Fishbone Jones]

I felt he did a great job representing himself and Canada. His comment: "I won't criticize the Prime Minister on foreign soil" and how he describes his role as the leader of the Loyal Opposition speaks well of the Canadian system. I am sure that quite few Americans are confused about a system with some decorum still remaining. I think a big point of this interview is to reach the US public and help push Canada's case in regards to tariffs and other political issues.

Comparatively, we have the other side.
Start at 7.3 minutes in.

"When everything pulls downward, grace rises above—composed, kind, and quietly commanding."

 

[FSTO]

He was on with Paul Wells recently.

The Q&A: "Something is fundamentally broken"

Pierre Poilievre's travel itinerary is new but his convictions don't change

open.substack.com

I haven't listened to this one yet

 

[ArmyRick]

As expected, it was an excellent podcast.

Same Pierre as last year, message is pretty much the same, but change the format and presentation, and suddenly many here are ok with Pierre.

What I see is some here could not sort through the noise and hear the signal last year. And I would also certainly pin some of this on Jenni Byrne. She was not the right campaign manager for battling the unknown PM MC. Her strategy was effective against PM JT but not Uncle Mark.

Again, very little has changed in his direction and policy proposals, it was just the wrapping and presentation.

 

[Jarnhamar]

As expected, it was an excellent podcast.

A lot of the expectations I saw pegged this interview (pre-release) as the nail in the coffin. Poilievre was done done done. No way he can recover.

 

[The Bread Guy]

As expected, it was an excellent podcast.

He did well, as he did with Mansbridge, sounding more approachable.

Same Pierre as last year, message is pretty much the same, but change the format and presentation, and suddenly many here are ok with Pierre.

I can’t remember tooooo many quotes on any podcasts before Outhouse took over as campaign manager where he said he’d work with government, or that it’s not his job to criticize government outside the country. Or saying out loud that POTUS47’s annexation/51st state talk wasn’t helpful. During the campaign, attack dog is fair ball but this is a new tone & track from his post-election/pre-leadership review look/feel.

What I see is some here could not sort through the noise and hear the signal last year.

Agree no shortage of noise, but we’ll have to agree to disagree that more than just a bit of the signal has changed.

And I would also certainly pin some of this on Jenni Byrne. She was not the right campaign manager for battling the unknown PM MC. Her strategy was effective against PM JT but not Uncle Mark.

Credit where due, JB was as fierce a political fighter (maybe even more so, given her face wasn’t as public) as her boss, and I suspect a big reason for the change in PP’s “how it’s delivered” is because of the new campaign manager. All that said, though, like following advice from the new guy is to his credit, gotta ding him for letting JB get sometimes a bit too cheap-shot-ish.

Again, very little has changed in his direction and policy proposals, it was just the wrapping and presentation.

That I’m good with, but many people still do judge a book by its cover, for better or worse (even when polls had PP way ahead of JT, the same groups of people said they weren’t happy with PP), so it appears PP is working on a different presentation style. I’m interested to see how it goes versus whatever happens with PMMC at the helm.