- Reaction score
- 9,831
- Points
- 1,160
Oh yeah. They're only complaining about it when it suits them.oh no. It’s an indictment of the CPC writing shitty rules and then crying foul about them.
Still something rhat should be supported.
Oh yeah. They're only complaining about it when it suits them.oh no. It’s an indictment of the CPC writing shitty rules and then crying foul about them.
He's not going to let anyone liquidate his portfolio. Whoever is in charge of the trust will likely be subservient to Carney. If you believe a blind trust of someone like Carney, is totally immune and insulated from his interference and direction, I have land you need to look at.except the caretaker has full power to buy and sell, and by this time next week any stocks etc that could be conflict could be sold. A lot of assumptions are being made without evidence
Because the timing of the release of information could directly impact Canadians ballot choices and Canadians deserve to be as informed as possible.examining information takes time, and thats what the commissioner is doing, so why not let him do his job?
Well, looks like Carney went to the GG, and it's expected an election call will be made Sunday. Game on!
did you seriously use a source called pierrepolievre news?He's not going to let anyone liquidate his portfolio. Whoever is in charge of the trust will likely be subservient to Carney. If you believe a blind trust of someone like Carney, is totally immune and insulated from his interference and direction, I have land you need to look at.
Politicians and blind trusts are an oxymoron.
How many politician in the last nine years have been accused of funneling government contracts to companies they own or participate in, while said assets were supposed to be out of touch to them.
If Carney is PM, are the billions of dollars in contracts to Brookefields going to stop? Legal or not, the perceived conflict is very, very real. Very few Canadians will believe he's not profiting from it. And perception is one of the big contributors to the supposed integrity of a politician.
Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions
The Government of Canada spent an estimated $1.1B in 2021-2022 on contracts with Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions. The average contract duration was 0.58 years, and the average contract value (not including contracts under $10k) was $40.7M. The longest contract was 13.41 years. The largest...govcanadacontracts.caBrookfield Global Integrated Solutions
The Government of Canada spent an estimated $1.1B in 2021-2022 on contracts with Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions.
Across 397 contracts active since the start of the 2017-2018 fiscal year, 21 have at least one amendment (5%). Of contracts with amendments, the average increase in dollar value was 40% and the average number of amendments was 1.1. Cumulatively these amendments represent an increase of $2.7B over the original contract values.
The average contract duration was 0.58 years, and the average contract value (not including contracts under $10k) was $40.7M. The longest contract was 13.41 years. The largest contract by value (including amendments) was $5.7B"
For example, I doubt you'll find many voters that believe Trudeau was 100% detached from his portfolio.
Justin Trudeau's Net Worth Revealed: From Teacher to Millionaire
Justin Trudeau's net worth is estimated to be $133 million as of 2025. This article delves into how he built his wealth from $1.67 million to this large sum.www.pierrepoilievrenews.ca
Justin Trudeau Net Worth Revealed: From Teacher to Prime Minister's Fortune
Editorial Team
27 Feb 2025 — 9 min read
Justin Trudeau's net worth is estimated to be $133 million as of 2025. His net worth jumped from $1.67 million in his early political days to $133.76 million now.
The Canadian Prime Minister earns an annual salary of $379,000, but his wealth reaches way beyond the reach and influence of his political career. His father Pierre Trudeau left him an inherited fortune of over $40 million. This inheritance, combined with his $50 million real estate portfolio and $20 million in stocks, demonstrates his financial well-being. His stock market investments have yielded exceptional results, growing at 48% annually over two decades. This performance significantly outpaces the typical investor's return of 11%.
Re-read your own paragraph. Your arguing against transparency. Thats the point. Liberals don't want any. Of course the Conservatives are after the Liberals. They are the OPPOSITION and doing a hell of good job of it.Yes, that's exactly what the CPC wants, the release of the information without an expert opinion attached to it so it can spin it however they like. Lets face it there is two outcomes here, The ethics commissioner says there is a Conflict of interest and the CPC can hell "ah ha, see!!" or none found and they will claim that of course a liberal appointed commissioner found no conflict. Either way they will try and smear Carney. that is their play book, because thats Pierre's default setting, attack dog, not statesman.
At some point, if he wins, he going to have to man up and meet trump face to face. This isn't about him and his ego. It's about Canada and Canadians.That’s a good reason not to go. Who wants to go into a room filled with people who are basically screaming at you? The session with Zelenskyy was either planned ahead of time (most likely) or quickly spiralled out of control. Regardless, Carney should never accept being treated the way Zelenskyy was. If or when that happens I wouldn’t blame Carney one bit for stopping the meeting and immediate walking out. Trump treats Putin, a man truly deserving of the title of war criminal, with far more dignity than he did Trudeau (with all his faults).
Going back in time, I wonder how Trump would have treated Hitler, say, in 1939-41, when all of Europe was ablaze and Britain, Canada, Australia, N.Z., Russia and several other nations stood against the might of the German war machine.
Challenge the narrative, not the source. Prove the source wrong. I'll wait.did you seriously use a source called pierrepolievre news?
Bullshit. At least two of that "crowd" have receipts in the thread as being either present or past members of Conservative political organizations.Its the "Liberals can do no wrong crowd/Conservatives can never get it right" crowd that is mind blowing partisan.
And if he loses, will you blame him for pissing it away, or the electorate for not votingI stand by that. When Pierre wins, if he pisses away and fucks it up all, I will turn my back on him faster than I did to Harper (who was 50 times the PM Trudeau was).
Well, looks like Carney went to the GG, and it's expected an election call will be made Sunday. Game on!
To be clear, since I'm one of those I would include was referenced in your post, I've not defended Trudeau's gaffs or ethical violations, but have rather promoted his successes to try and show that it's not "all bad".I am avoiding saying much here. Its the "Liberals can do no wrong crowd/Conservatives can never get it right" crowd that is mind blowing partisan.
Here is something I posted on my FB account on Feb 2, 2025
"What is the biggest difference between Liberal and Conservative voters? Easy.
When a Liberal Leaders fuck up, the Liberal voter will defend them at all cost, truth and facts be damned, the leader must be protected.
When a Conservative leader fucks up, the conservative voters walk away from them and refuse to support them.
It is called integrity."
I stand by that. When Pierre wins, if he pisses away and fucks it up all, I will turn my back on him faster than I did to Harper (who was 50 times the PM Trudeau was).
Well it says this for starters.Challenge the narrative, not the source. Prove the source wrong. I'll wait.
I was unclear. I was talking about a small but significant portion of the CPC that was tarred with the “Reform” label, not the party as a whole or Poilievre specifically.The term "Maple MAGA" is such utter nonsense.
Leaving aside Trump's recent comments, it completely ignores both current and historical policies and voting records. The present-day Conservative Party is actually in line with the American Democrats, if not to the left. Poilievre himself would be labeled a RINO by Republican voters.
Even with gun laws, they would be labeled anti-gun by Republicans and the NRA because the Conservative policy is only to roll back to Harper era laws, not dismantle the Firearms Act. Even the Democrats aren't asking for regulations that strict, and even California doesn't have laws quite like us.
Meanwhile, over in the Team Blue locker room ...
Also archived here if previous link doesn't work.![]()
Insiders say Pierre Poilievre called Doug Ford for ‘advice’ — but the premier said he’ll be ‘staying out’ of the election
Ontario Premier Doug Ford told Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre he would be too busy governing Ontario to help in the upcoming federal election campaign.www.thestar.com
He sounds like a perfect fit.His candidacy announcement comes nearly a decade after CBC fired the then host of Power & Politics and The House, following reports he was brokering art deals with people he interviewed as a journalist — including Carney.