• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

Make no mistake; Churchill would be an isolated and probably crappy posting, particularly for families. Maybe CAF should consider a ‘fly in/fly out’ rotational model for many of the hypothetical staff like a lot of the work camps or some of the remote RCMP posts do? Families could live where it makes sense to live, and every two weeks people rotate in and out. Bust your ass for two weeks, fly home to Winnipeg or Edmonton for two weeks off. Might even be cheaper than cost moves up there.
Maybe if we reopen CFS Bermuda, we could throw in priority postings for people who do far north taskings.
 
Fort MacMurray

1961 - 1,110
1971 - 6,681
1981 - 31,000 (boom census data unreliable due to transients and temporary housing)
1991 - 33,698
2001 - 30,000 - 40,000 (boom census data unreliable due to transients and temporary housing)
2011 - 61,374
2021 - 68,002

There is no reason, to my mind why places like Churchill and Iqaluit, Goose Bay and Gray's Bay, given the right circumstances, couldn't achieve similar growth. Yellowknife and Whitehorse both started as trading posts.

Once upon a time the entire white population of the lower mainland fitted inside a stockade at Fort Langley.

No city in Canada started with a divided highway servicing it.

The market imperative for the railroad to Vancouver in 1867 was just as obscure as that to Churchill. In fact the prospect for the Churchill route in 1867 was probably better tha that of Vancouver because the HBC had already started laying rail for wagonways at portage points to move both freight and York Boats.
That's the formal city census numbers only too cited for Fort Mac.

Doesn't include the 10,000's that were in industrial camps all around the city.
 
Some clear eyed commentary on the CPC convention from conservative pundits. Both seem tired, Jen seems exasperated.

Interesting excerpt:
Why not? Because almost half the Conservative base approves of Trump. According to an Angus Reid survey , 33 per cent of Conservative voters give Trump an “A” or a “B” for his first year of his second term and fifteen per cent give him a “C.” In contrast, zero Liberal and NDP voters grade him higher than “C” and over 90 per cent give him an “F” — compared to only a third of CPC voters.
That's an ideological tent held together by shoe lace and duct tape

Tasha Khereiddin
Jen Gerson
 
Seems like the Davos speech really worked in his favor domestically. He just needs a solid two quarters of positive economic news to cement his position. If he can get south Korean to bring manufacturing jobs to Southern ontario, that will likely flip a few areas red.
 
Seems like the Davos speech really worked in his favor domestically. He just needs a solid two quarters of positive economic news to cement his position. If he can get south Korean to bring manufacturing jobs to Southern ontario, that will likely flip a few areas red.
Plus resource extraction and processing industries (eg steel mills).
 
He can't do much not being part of the cabinet and also a backbencher in his own party, but he won't be going in entirely ignorant.

Archive


Here's hoping Harper and Chretien's message struck home. More of this, including actions.

 
He can't do much not being part of the cabinet and also a backbencher in his own party, but he won't be going in entirely ignorant.

Archive
He’s also friends with Vance.
Here's hoping Harper and Chretien's message struck home. More of this, including actions.

Both parties working together for Canada?

All for it.
 
Which is a recipe for disaster in the Westminster Parliamentary system...
Unfortunately, the inverse has occurred in recent years, insomuch that the Loyal Opposition under the CPC (and it's leaders) has taken the name literally; often opposing legislation that is in-line or adjacent to their own platforms.

The Opposition serves to question and influence government business on behalf of and in the interest of the Crown (and the subject thus represented).

Turning the nose up at legislation that is for the betterment of the Canadian interest, strictly because it comes in one colour wrapping vice another, is not their raison d'etre.
 
Which is a recipe for disaster in the Westminster Parliamentary system...

If the opposition is not continually on the government like a terrier on a rat colony then you get something like... BC ;)
Or the last session, where opposition allows a minority government to act like a majority and ram through unpopular legislation and shut down committees.
 
Back
Top