While not saying how much the plan would cost, sky high by DND standards must be really high.
but the process must be adhered toSo, a four year delay over $200M, or 0.5% of our budget? That’s be like most of us making a huge deal over $500 on a car purchase….
What are the feelings on returning some airframes to Trenton? Or should the 3 additional machines go to each location they are operating out of now, for redundancy or to be a fallback bird?The government had initially budgeted $1.03B for the project when it was announced in 2018, but negotiations broke down over the cost being deemed too expensive
Author of the article: The Canadian Press Lee Berthiaume
PublThe Cormorants are currently used to conduct search-and-rescue missions out of Comox, B.C., Gander, Nfld., and Greenwood, N.S. The addition of three more helicopters is expected to see the fleet expand to include operations out of Trenton, Ont.
Liberals announce $1.24B sole-sourced deal to upgrade search and rescue helicopter fleet
The Griffon is not suitable as a primary SAR asset and this two-year stopgap is long overdue to end. Range is too short (AOR goes to the North Pole, the Griffon is a joke for anything past Sudbury), payload is too low, it doesn’t have a 4-axis autopilot, it doesn’t have enough power. The last two mean that hovering over the water is extremely difficult, there’s no references and no autopilot, and if you mess it up the aircraft doesn’t have enough power to bail you out. This needs to end.What are the feelings on returning some airframes to Trenton? Or should the 3 additional machines go to each location they are operating out of now, for redundancy or to be a fallback bird?
I think you were looking for this @KevinBI’m shocked I tell you, to hear that the Griffon has yet another role it’s assigned to that it’s unsuitable for.
Wait.
No I’m not.
You mean, besides every role it's assigned to?I’m shocked I tell you, to hear that the Griffon has yet another role it’s assigned to that it’s unsuitable for.
Wait.
No I’m not.
Honest question bc I don't know much about the fling-wing side of the house:Edit: it also can’t fly in icing conditions. In Canada.
Cormorant and Cyclone, for sure. Not certain about Chinook.Honest question bc I don't know much about the fling-wing side of the house:
What helicopters are certified to fly in icing? Isn't the big spinning thing bad for ice accumulation?
Hook is certified for flight in known light icing. It has engine inlet anti-icing and heated windscreen for anti-icing, but not active blade de-icing…other than having 10,000hp to shed ice if need be (it has proven performance in that department, though not approved for intentional flight into anything worse than Light).Cormorant and Cyclone, for sure. Not certain about Chinook.
Hook is certified for flight in known light icing. It has engine inlet anti-icing and heated windscreen for anti-icing, but not active blade de-icing…other than having 10,000hp to shed ice if need be (it has proven performance in that department, though not approved for intentional flight into anything worse than Light).
Anecdotally the HH-47 would have had full de-ice capability. It is an OEM option for those that wish, backed up with 1/6 MW of on-board electrical generation.
Don’t be daft.But are there USB plugs for the pilot to keep their iPad flight manual fully charged?
Aeronautical-spec USB-C was in the plans for a mid-life, but you can plug the USB brick into the 115vac plug in the cockpit plug.But are there USB plugs for the pilot to keep their iPad flight manual fully charged?
Isn’t it a fair requirement?But are there USB plugs for the pilot to keep their iPad flight manual fully charged?
Electronic charts are not to be used for navigationBut are there USB plugs for the pilot to keep their iPad flight manual fully charged?