- Reaction score
- 18,763
- Points
- 1,160
Well a timely video and good on all involved.

Seriously?Why ?
Lancaster mag pouches and he appears to have a rifle, interesting.Landing party, properly kitted out (and not a red shirt among them)
View attachment 101860
And on patrol.
View attachment 101862
Seriously?
I mean if the RCN wants to form Marines then fill your boots. I'm not carrying water for the infantry or recce folks. But seriously, there's a certain amount of skill in doing dismounted patrols and fighting if need be. It's a skill set that I don't expect the average sailor to have anymore than the infantry are operators of blue water craft. Each to his own.
I obviously see more to littoral patrol ops than merely cruising the shoreline.
And it seems there are no laws that are not martial in your envisioned world.The military exists to allow the government to act in defence of its interests. It always has done. Police forces, the newer government force, was raised explicitly as an alternative to the armed military to control co-operative civil population.
There are no tasks that are not military.
All of that is fine and good if you want to draw the line where you are drawing it.Yes.
We don't need marines. Our job isn't fight any deeper than the jettys and shores lines.
I actually trained for that what back when I was on my Naval LANDING Boarding Party course.
This is how Google defines it:
Littoral patrolling is the military or naval act of watching, guarding, and scouting shallow coastal waters, near-shore zones, and beaches where the land and sea meet. It aims to find threats, stop illegal movement, and secure areas close to the coast.
And it seems there are no laws that are not martial in your envisioned world.
All of that is fine and good if you want to draw the line where you are drawing it.
There are places along our coasts, inaccessible by land, where you may want to, or need to, routinely go deeper and do more than that. Sometimes a boat is just transport for other people and other capabilities.
I guess we'll never see eye to eye on this one. I find that strange seeing as there are literally several dozens of examples of countries who have Marines as part of their military, most of whom use them in defence of their own shorelines rather than for expeditionary operations, and who almost always have less shoreline or shore-based infrastructure to patrol and protect than Canada does.
I can't quite understand why our navy, and in fairness, much of the army, dismisses the need for that. I can see why when the money and people are in tight supply, but the need is there and window of opportunity is opening. We should be looking a bit more outside the box and start developing a comprehensive and joint A2/AD strategy in all of its aspects.
![]()
Good enough. So the threat is not military.
Do we agree that there is an elevated threat demanding an increased security presence?
Do we agree that the ability of drones to carry explosive payloads, CBRN payloads and EW payloads to targets within the borders of Canada has created a novel threat that requires addressing?
Do we add an anti-aircraft component to the RCMP? Increase the RCMP harbour and port patrols? The Marine Division? Do we increase the number of RCMP auxilliaries by 300,000 to meet the changed security environment?
....
The military exists to allow the government to act in defence of its interests. It always has done. Police forces, the newer government force, was raised explicitly as an alternative to the armed military to control co-operative civil population.
There are no tasks that are not military.
www.forbes.com
Plan to your heart's content, but a civil, democratic society has roles and rules, even during national emergencies. The Emergencies Act purposely gives nod to the Charter; would you have it otherwise?Any plan should encompass the worst-case scenario. The worst-case scenario is a lawless world. A world in which order, our order and our rules, need to be imposed.
Others are only too willing to impose their order and rules on us.
Our tolerant society has been built on 500 years of hope fuelled progress.
Unfortunately the order that we imposed was not universally welcomed.
The CAF has, in the past, deployed to emergencies at federal penitentiaries. Non-federal police have deployed to emergencies at provincial institutions. The RCMP is a national police service but, best as I can determine, only about 18% of its sworn members are assigned to federal policing, so the vast majority are little different that any other police officer. Should the Deep River PS have AAR responsibilities?There are no tasks that are not miiitary.
Should the Deep River PS have AAR responsibilities?
