- Reaction score
- 5,110
- Points
- 1,160
And First Nations.Another issue Quebec would need to consider is the need to negotiate trade deals with the US, as they would be a sovereign state not covered under USMCA, or other Canadian trade deals.
And First Nations.Another issue Quebec would need to consider is the need to negotiate trade deals with the US, as they would be a sovereign state not covered under USMCA, or other Canadian trade deals.
This. It's also a huge strike against Canadian Republicanism, as the AFN has very clearly said any treaties negotiated by the Crown would become void and need to be renegotiated (on far better terms I would imagine as well).And First Nations.
Perfect time to offer up $$ and land buy out to all FN and abolish the Indian Act, reservations, and treaties with the Crown altogether.This. It's also a huge strike against Canadian Republicanism, as the AFN has very clearly said any treaties negotiated by the Crown would become void and need to be renegotiated (on far better terms I would imagine as well).
I imagine a New Quebec would face the same reality.
All this because General Wolfe decided to play musket ball catch with his chest in 1759...
I suspect Quebec would just decide that they had no rights as part of their newly found Constitution.And First Nations.
Considering that many say 'this' (in this discussion, Quebec) is all theirs, buying them out would amount to buying the entirety of Quebec. I wonder what the new nation's credit limit would be.Perfect time to offer up $$ and land buy out to all FN and abolish the Indian Act, reservations, and treaties with the Crown altogether.
Congrats you're now citizens with the same rights as everyone else. You can sell your land if you want to also.
They did come to a several billion dollar agreement to let them essentially dam and divert most of the northern part of the province, so I guess that could be considered a treaty. Most of the FNs within the province actually aren't covered by treaty.Quebec has been pretty good at dealing with its own treaties. I suspect they will just offer the same or better deals and try to get them onside. That they would be better served in a newly independent Quebec than in a fractured Canada.
I doubt they go the annex route.
It might be tough to get recognized as a legitimate nation by the rest of the world when you start out acting like a bully. Besides, who's going to enforce it?I suspect Quebec would just decide that they had no rights as part of their newly found Constitution.
Annex the land, and say sue us, in our new Supreme Court of Quebec...
Considering that many say 'this' (in this discussion, Quebec) is all theirs, buying them out would amount to buying the entirety of Quebec. I wonder what the new nation's credit limit would be.
I'm not sure 'the same rights as everyone else' would satisfy all FNs but, then again, everything does have a price.
They did come to a several billion dollar agreement to let them essentially dam and divert most of the northern part of the province, so I guess that could be considered a treaty. Most of the FNs within the province actually aren't covered by treaty.
Your assuming any new nation would be willing to negotiate and accept the first nations as separate entities. It could be a opportunity for true egalitarian action and the abolishment of separate nations within the nation.This. It's also a huge strike against Canadian Republicanism, as the AFN has very clearly said any treaties negotiated by the Crown would become void and need to be renegotiated (on far better terms I would imagine as well).
I imagine a New Quebec would face the same reality.
All this because General Wolfe decided to play musket ball catch with his chest in 1759...
When they held the last vote to separate they had a slush fund of billions of dollars and the next day the funds did not materialize as they lost the vote and they put the money back where it was suppose to be. Or the money was never really there.
If they were to have another vote, this would just make the West even more radical about not sending money to Ottawa that is spent on Quebec. Equalization Payments are not equal in any way or shape.
I wonder if Quebec did manage to separate, do they realize the First Nations Land where the Hydro Quebec power dams are located are not in Quebec ? The First Nations as much as they do not like Ottawa and the politics did request RCMP and the Canadian Military to come help secure their lands as they were not going to be a part of the New Quebec.
Governments have money on paper but they have a hard time finding it when it comes to spending it on long term projects.
Yeah no…Of course the big elephant in the room is the United States, because they would worry that foreign elements (China, Russia, etc) could gain influence in the new independent Quebec and the Americans would see that as a threat (justified) to their security.
So, 10 minutes after Quebec declares sovereignty, the !0th Mountain Division moves north, along with the 82nd Airborne and/or 101st Airmobile Division, plus a lot of other formations. In fact, the US might just say the heck with it take over the whole country.
We could only be so lucky….Of course the big elephant in the room is the United States, because they would worry that foreign elements (China, Russia, etc) could gain influence in the new independent Quebec and the Americans would see that as a threat (justified) to their security.
So, 10 minutes after Quebec declares sovereignty, the !0th Mountain Division moves north, along with the 82nd Airborne and/or 101st Airmobile Division, plus a lot of other formations. In fact, the US might just say the heck with it take over the whole country.
Of course the big elephant in the room is the United States, because they would worry that foreign elements (China, Russia, etc) could gain influence in the new independent Quebec and the Americans would see that as a threat (justified) to their security.
So, 10 minutes after Quebec declares sovereignty, the !0th Mountain Division moves north, along with the 82nd Airborne and/or 101st Airmobile Division, plus a lot of other formations. In fact, the US might just say the heck with it take over the whole country.
Said much better than me.Yeah no…
A more likely scenario is the US not recognizing QC as a country until a mutual and negotiated deal is achieved. If a separation is peaceful (and it truly would be between Canada and QC as entitities) then the US would:
-move to secure the QC border points.
-seek assurances that the st Laurence River remain open (hint: it would)
-exclude QC from any USMCA initially until QC could negotiate entry
-entertain diplomatic overtures
-exclude them from any military pact initially until properly negotiated (QC would likely not even want to be in NATO a but might be interested in contributing to NORAD)
-the will seek assurances that QC keep providing the US North East with cheap electricity and they will gladly keep that deal going.
At the end of the day, North America has an integrated economy and that includes QC. The US will want to minimise any disruptions to that and will like everyone else try to renegotiate deals to their advantage if they can. A new QC country may be a little too eager to get into those and might get a few raw deals if they aren’t careful (they won’t have the same leverage over various items like a unified Canada would have). I suspect that they could end up on the short end of the stick, they will after all be the smallest economy in North America in the event of a successful separation.
That lines up with my thinking apart from the bolded bit. Not sure if you read the initial article, but it clearly stated not spending on defense would be part of the savings to make an independent Quebec viable.Yeah no…
A more likely scenario is the US not recognizing QC as a country until a mutual and negotiated deal is achieved. If a separation is peaceful (and it truly would be between Canada and QC as entitities) then the US would:
-move to secure the QC border points.
-seek assurances that the st Laurence River remain open (hint: it would)
-exclude QC from any USMCA initially until QC could negotiate entry
-entertain diplomatic overtures
-exclude them from any military pact initially until properly negotiated (QC would likely not even want to be in NATO a but might be interested in contributing to NORAD)
-the will seek assurances that QC keep providing the US North East with cheap electricity and they will gladly keep that deal going.
At the end of the day, North America has an integrated economy and that includes QC. The US will want to minimise any disruptions to that and will like everyone else try to renegotiate deals to their advantage if they can. A new QC country may be a little too eager to get into those and might get a few raw deals if they aren’t careful (they won’t have the same leverage over various items like a unified Canada would have). I suspect that they could end up on the short end of the stick, they will after all be the smallest economy in North America in the event of a successful separation.
Why would they want another California?Of course the big elephant in the room is the United States, because they would worry that foreign elements (China, Russia, etc) could gain influence in the new independent Quebec and the Americans would see that as a threat (justified) to their security.
So, 10 minutes after Quebec declares sovereignty, the !0th Mountain Division moves north, along with the 82nd Airborne and/or 101st Airmobile Division, plus a lot of other formations. In fact, the US might just say the heck with it take over the whole country.