- Reaction score
- 22,380
- Points
- 1,260
DLR boot trial
DLRick one of three boots.
A)
B)
C)
Soldier: I want A
DLR: sorry we don't have A in your size
Soldier: okay what can I have?
DLR: take C no one else wanted it.
Soldier wear C for two months, just has it broken in as the first 3 week he took trying to get his CSM/RSM to lket him wear them, as they where different and there was no message attached to the boots authorizing them for wear.
DLR: great what do you think of the boots.
Soldier: Well I have only worn them a few times, never been on ex, or rucked with them.
DLR: we dont care - what do you think of them
Soldier: I really think A looked better.
DLR: okay likes Boot A
*********************************************************
Somewhat facetious stab at the trial method but in all reality, unless soldiers get multiple pieces of gear, they cannot offer a true opinion on how something compares.
Feet are very individual - I had a boot chit since 1995, when I got back in 2002, the system had changed, and they had no boots, so I just wore what I wanted, and only a few times did an RSM ever bother to ask me why.
Quite honestly the boot is the ONE thing that soldier should get some leeway on. Its not like its the end of the world is Pte Bloggins has a slightly different boot than Cpl What'shisnose, or Capt Clownshoes. The end of the day is the mission getting accomplished?
From where I sit the CF could save a metric shit ton of money in a $200/year boot allowance. And also admit that if an individual boot is destroyed by a service related incident that the soldier turns that boot in for another allowance that year.
(I had a set of LPO Danners ruined in Bridgeport CA in Mountain Training, and was just out a pair of Danner -- good job system).
Worried about boots for deployed troops - fix the MAIL, and/or just mandate another set to be brought.
DLRick one of three boots.
A)
B)
C)
Soldier: I want A
DLR: sorry we don't have A in your size
Soldier: okay what can I have?
DLR: take C no one else wanted it.
Soldier wear C for two months, just has it broken in as the first 3 week he took trying to get his CSM/RSM to lket him wear them, as they where different and there was no message attached to the boots authorizing them for wear.
DLR: great what do you think of the boots.
Soldier: Well I have only worn them a few times, never been on ex, or rucked with them.
DLR: we dont care - what do you think of them
Soldier: I really think A looked better.
DLR: okay likes Boot A
*********************************************************
Somewhat facetious stab at the trial method but in all reality, unless soldiers get multiple pieces of gear, they cannot offer a true opinion on how something compares.
Feet are very individual - I had a boot chit since 1995, when I got back in 2002, the system had changed, and they had no boots, so I just wore what I wanted, and only a few times did an RSM ever bother to ask me why.
Quite honestly the boot is the ONE thing that soldier should get some leeway on. Its not like its the end of the world is Pte Bloggins has a slightly different boot than Cpl What'shisnose, or Capt Clownshoes. The end of the day is the mission getting accomplished?
From where I sit the CF could save a metric shit ton of money in a $200/year boot allowance. And also admit that if an individual boot is destroyed by a service related incident that the soldier turns that boot in for another allowance that year.
(I had a set of LPO Danners ruined in Bridgeport CA in Mountain Training, and was just out a pair of Danner -- good job system).
Worried about boots for deployed troops - fix the MAIL, and/or just mandate another set to be brought.