So you wear it on your sleeve?
Yeah, bad use of phrase. Sure and I freely admit my bias. Unlike others that seeth at the mere mention of Trump but deny they have bias even when it's obvious.
That is, of course, incorrect. But that’s why you only quoted my third paragraph, and not my second.
I’m a simple man. What is the evidence? What is the law? Apply the latter to the former and then allow the prosecutorial and judicial gears to turn.
You consistently appear not to believe in that if it conflicts with your political preference, literally to the point where you won’t/wouldn’t even accept any criminal conviction of Trump with the possible exception of if it remains upheld once all appeals are exhausted. We know this because you said so- and even then you gave yourself plenty of room to weasel out of even that.
I’ll credit you with consistency at least. So far there’s absolutely no tort or crime that Trump has been credibly alleged, or found by a judge or a jury to have committed that seems to come close to triggering any belief of yours in accountability.
You got all pissy at me before when I quoted your whole post but only addressed a certain point. I told you then, the next time I wanted to address a point of yours, I'd cut the rest out and only address what was left. That's all I did.
And you're right, I won’t accept a verdict until the appeals are done. I have a healthy distrust of big governmment, having seen them exposed too many times. Democrat or Republican. Liberal and Conservative. Too much money, grift and dishonesty. All for power. Because once they taste that power, it's never enough.I see absolutely nothing wrong with waiting until a person exhausts all legal action, because it's their right. If they hadn't protected Biden and charged him for his theft of classified documents, I'd be happy as a pig in shit.. However, I'd wait until his appeal was in before crowing about it. Even though I think there is plenty of guilt there, he's entitled to that. All your warrants, affidavits and grand jury's, that you love shoving in people's faces, don't prove guilt. They prove someone on one side wants someone else in court. They are not proof of guilt. If all appeals fail and the person is sentenced, you can make the assumption the paperwork was correct. If they win on appeal, you can assume the paperwork that got it going was faulty.
Nothing will change. You'll still hate Trump and proclaim me as some sort of conspiracy theorist because I don't accept your paperwork premise. I'll continue to allow someone the right to exhaust the system in pursuit of their innocence and keep my distrust of big governmment especially with all the criminal behavior of the three letter agencies.
Innocent until proven guilty. Even if that means going to appeal. Why would they have appeal courts if every lower court judgement was infallible? If the law considers them needed to ensure justice is fair, so do I.
So, in the future, you can continue slagging me and I'll decide whether you warrant an answer. Matter of fact, I'll likely default to our previous status quo for awhile. I'm finding this tedious.
cbsaustin.com
