daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 48,040
- Points
- 1,160
Good god, literal majority of Quebecers support the LPC.
At least the BQ are in the basement...

Good god, literal majority of Quebecers support the LPC.
I don't see it. I see long-term, passive asset-holding investors being the type to own an airport, like pension funds. The likes of Rogers like to both own things and run things.Welcome to the Rogers international airport.
jetsetrides.com
Looks like one of the criticisms of that model is the risk of increased fares for fliers due to the need to generate returns for investors.
You mean air canada can get higher?Yeah, I haven’t heard good things about where this happened elsewhere. Usually, privatized airports = higher airfares.
goes without saying. If the current owners are making X dollars within the current structure they are going to rent out the facility for at least X otherwise there is no advantage to the change. The lessor therefore has to charge X + to make a profit. So all the tenants within the property have to come up with the difference. We are screwed again.Looks like one of the criticisms of that model is the risk of increased fares for fliers due to the need to generate returns for investors.
Which might lead to more airlines heading to nearby, cheaper airports (Stanstead instead of Heathrow, for example). It’ll be interesting to see how it unfolds.Looks like one of the criticisms of that model is the risk of increased fares for fliers due to the need to generate returns for investors.
Can you explain why for those of us who tend to drag a couple knuckles when we walk?That is a game changer.
@HavokFour laid out in the posting directly after mine the best examples on why this is positive issue for large scale investment purposes.Can you explain why for those of us who tend to drag a couple knuckles when we walk?
There is a reason Saskatchewan has the lowest cellular service costs in Canada.I think a lesson we should have learned is to not sell of important infrastructure to private companies.
Not aware of the ins and outs of what happened in NS with electricity but the issue could have been poorly structured terms done by the Provincial Gov't. Could they have have been 'incompetent' in the ability to negotiate a good deal?I think a lesson we should have learned is to not sell of important infrastructure to private companies.
At least in NS this was done with power, and its screwed the province and its people ever since, with no way out.
Not aware of the ins and outs of what happened in NS with electricity but the issue could have been poorly structured terms done by the Provincial Gov't. Could they have have been 'incompetent' in the ability to negotiate a good deal?
www.halifaxexaminer.ca
www.halifaxexaminer.ca
Just so I understand, this sell off of NS occurred over 30yrs ago, in 1992, correct? It was done in order to lower the debt of NS and was sold for what seems to be the incredibly tiny amount of of 192$ million, which even going back to 1992 seems small.Heres a bunch of links, enjoy.
*average monthly bills among the highest in Canada at roughly $387
Nova Scotia Power president Peter Gregg gets a 65% raise, now makes $1.73 million - Halifax Examiner
Nova Scotia has Canada's highest electrical rates.www.halifaxexaminer.ca
![]()
Nova Scotia Power's service is getting even worse, so UARB fines the company $750,000 - Halifax Examiner
Nova Scotia Power must pay a fine of $750,000 for failing to meet performance targets in 2022. The penalty is contained in a 14-page decision published yesterday by the Utilities and Review Board (UARB). Last year was the sixth consecutive year that Nova Scotia Power failed to meet certain...www.halifaxexaminer.ca
![]()
N.S. government tables bill to review new regulation system for Nova Scotia Power
The premier of Nova Scotia Premier says his government is triggering a review into how the province’s major power utility earns its income in order to see whether this leads to better service and accountability.www.ctvnews.ca
Just so I understand, this sell off of NS occurred over 30yrs ago, in 1992, correct? It was done in order to lower the debt of NS and was sold for what seems to be the incredibly tiny amount of of 192$ million, which even going back to 1992 seems small.
"But I'm sure it'll work this time."Not aware of the ins and outs of what happened in NS with electricity but the issue could have been poorly structured terms done by the Provincial Gov't. Could they have have been 'incompetent' in the ability to negotiate a good deal?
Carney is always the smartest man in the room. If you're not agreeing with him you're wrong."But I'm sure it'll work this time."