- Reaction score
- 31,497
- Points
- 1,260
Which is something that any lawyer or contracts person in competitors will use to suggest the solicitation was rigged.Maybe the museum jumped the shark and knew something we didnt.![]()

Which is something that any lawyer or contracts person in competitors will use to suggest the solicitation was rigged.Maybe the museum jumped the shark and knew something we didnt.![]()
We shall see.Which is something that any lawyer or contracts person in competitors will use to suggest the solicitation was rigged.
Is the write up similar to other vehicles in the collection? Even if it's on loan , its part of the collection.A good write-up on the Senator from the Canadian War Museum. Its gotta be the top contender at this point for LUV phase 2.
![]()
Roshel Senator MRAP
Introduced during the Cold War, the M113A2 TOW Under Armour (TUA) was intended to counter Warsaw Pact armoured vehicles.www.warmuseum.ca
Interesting, I imagine the umbilical also has a power wire in it? I wonder how long the motors are rated for in continuous flight mode?
Bingo. It was a not very useful vehicle.The LSVW definitely was a downgrade over the 5/4 Chevy’s.
Not sure of that one specifically.How do these types of systems work? Are they piloted remotely from a ground station or is a route/grid programmed in and it self drives?
When we switched over from the 3/4 tons to the 5/4 tons we thought the new trucks were wimpy pieces of shit, especially after getting stuck in sand dunes in Shilo. They were much more more comfortable and better on highways. Never did like the CP boxes on the back although the added height over the 3/4 TPU was nice.Bingo. It was a not very useful vehicle.
The old Chev 5/4 was one tough fuckin truck
When we switched over from the 3/4 tons to the 5/4 tons we thought the new trucks were wimpy pieces of shit, especially after getting stuck in sand dunes in Shilo. They were much more more comfortable and better on highways. Never did like the CP boxes on the back although the added height over the 3/4 TPU was nice.
It took us some time to warm up to them. I must admit, as BK I did trade my 1/4 ton M151 in for a 5/4 cargo when I went back to Shilo the second time.
![]()




The Dodge 3/4 were very tough trucks. The 5/4 suffered front axle problems when first introduced. The comfort level inside was miles above the 3/4 tons.When we switched over from the 3/4 tons to the 5/4 tons we thought the new trucks were wimpy pieces of shit, especially after getting stuck in sand dunes in Shilo. They were much more more comfortable and better on highways. Never did like the CP boxes on the back although the added height over the 3/4 TPU was nice.
It took us some time to warm up to them. I must admit, as BK I did trade my 1/4 ton M151 in for a 5/4 cargo when I went back to Shilo the second time.
![]()
Our biggest problem in Shilo was sand. Shilo is very sandy and the trails are mostly just beaten down prairie grass. The big problem is whenever a trail went over a tiny bump the vehicles churned up and loosened the sand over time. Wheeled vehicles frequently had a problem with those little sand traps and the 5/4 especially was very susceptible to quickly digging itself in up to the axles on the up slopes. The 3/4 had been able to handle those much better.The Dodge 3/4 were very tough trucks. The 5/4 suffered front axle problems when first introduced. The comfort level inside was miles above the 3/4 tons.
