Author Topic: Site blocked  (Read 3777 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 57Chevy

    widower.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 36,995
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,381
Site blocked
« on: December 12, 2017, 04:59:38 »
Figure I'd pass this on.

Offline Mike Bobbitt

  • Army.ca Owner
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 117,625
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 12,185
    • Army.ca
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2017, 05:29:14 »
Thanks... site shows clean though: https://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=army.ca

Offline jmt18325

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 22,530
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,215
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2017, 20:58:51 »
I get a security warning for this site quite regularly, actually.

Offline dapaterson

    Mostly Harmless.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 437,775
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 16,199
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2017, 21:04:52 »
If you are comfortable posting the information, identifying your browser, operating system, and ISP might be helpful in trying to figure out where the problem lies.

I run Chrome on Win 10 and use TekSavvy, and get no such errors.
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Offline PuckChaser

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 915,110
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,090
    • Peacekeeper's Homepage
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2017, 08:22:35 »
Don't need to post ISP, admins can see it.

Are you guys getting the error on the main page or when clicking on certain links? If it's the same link or a reproducible problem it will help track it down. SSL certificates can be finicky; I've seen plenty of false positives on major websites.

Offline Harris

    Is back at the grind.

  • Directing Staff
  • Full Member
  • *
  • 354,658
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 499
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2017, 10:06:48 »
Chrome with Avast on Windows 10 is GTG.
Cheers

Todd
Army.ca

"...persons escaping a lethal dose of radiation may well be rendered seriously ill and or be more prone to various forms of cancer in later years. Hence, their morale and performance may be expected to slump."
Crap, I think I got a lethal dose!!!

Offline Mike Bobbitt

  • Army.ca Owner
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 117,625
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 12,185
    • Army.ca
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2017, 13:30:24 »
I get a security warning for this site quite regularly, actually.

The exact wording or a screenshot of the warning and URL you were visiting when it appeared would help a great deal. Might be useful also to know if the warnings always occur from E.G. inside DND or another org, in case they are trying to proxy HTTPS and inserting a problem. I'm pretty sensitive to security issues so if there is one I'd like to see it resolved.

Offline E.R. Campbell

  • Retired, years ago
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 479,085
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 18,340
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2017, 20:07:02 »
I'm using Chrome (Version 62.0.3202.94 (Official Build) (64-bit)) on a Mac (OSX High Sierra 10.13.1) and I've had no warnings.
It is ill that men should kill one another in seditions, tumults and wars; but it is worse to bring nations to such misery, weakness and baseness
as to have neither strength nor courage to contend for anything; to have nothing left worth defending and to give the name of peace to desolation.
Algernon Sidney in Discourses Concerning Government, (1698)
----------
Like what you see/read here on Army.ca?  Subscribe, and help keep it "on the air!"

Offline NFLD Sapper

  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 281,601
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,023
  • CFSME STAFF
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2017, 20:46:07 »
No issues here: Chrome Version 63.0.3239.84 (Official Build) (64-bit) and Windows 10 Home 1709 Build 16299.125
CHIMO!
First in, Last out
Sappers Lead the Way

Just tell your wife she owes your life to some Muddy Old Engineer,
Some dusty, crusty, croaking, joking Muddy Old Engineer

Offline jmt18325

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 22,530
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,215
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2017, 21:13:35 »
I think I've figured it out.

I generally type forums.army.ca because that's what I was used to - that's where the warning comes up.  Once I reload the page from the main site, the certificate goes from invalid to valid.  It's because the website address has changed, and the certificate is no longer valid for the old address - I don't think it's an actual issue that you need to worry about.

Offline Mike Bobbitt

  • Army.ca Owner
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 117,625
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 12,185
    • Army.ca
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2017, 09:12:40 »
Bingo. Our SSL (security) certificate is issued to Army.ca, not forums.army.ca. In this case the warning legitimately indicates that the certificate does not match the site you are visiting.

I think I've figured it out.

I generally type forums.army.ca because that's what I was used to - that's where the warning comes up.  Once I reload the page from the main site, the certificate goes from invalid to valid.  It's because the website address has changed, and the certificate is no longer valid for the old address - I don't think it's an actual issue that you need to worry about.

Offline jmt18325

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 22,530
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,215
Re: Site blocked
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2017, 10:00:50 »
Bingo. Our SSL (security) certificate is issued to Army.ca, not forums.army.ca. In this case the warning legitimately indicates that the certificate does not match the site you are visiting.

I'm assuming that must be the problem that the OP encountered as well.  I never doubted the security of the site, I simply before now assumed that it was some kind of glitch.