- Reaction score
- 13,220
- Points
- 1,160
Another by election coming for september or October now
What the heck is going on with Poilievre?

Another by election coming for september or October now
I agree.Affordability is suppressing family formation and birth rates. Addressing housing costs, childcare costs, and wages is a more sustainable long-term solution than relying primarily on high immigration levels.
Eventually, but much more slowly. Children give governments about 17-30 years of lead time.A country that can't afford to raise its own birth rate will eventually struggle to absorb ever growing population.
One can be concerned about birth rates without advocating for increased immigration. In fact, i wouod rather see more pro natalist policies being considered more than i want more immigration.The birthrate is being used as a boogeyman to justify terrible immigration practices. Cost of living goes up, it's harder to raise a family, birthrate drops, we need more immigration to pay the bills.
Carney got three dropping, so what does that say about him?What the heck is going on with Poilievre?
That the old guard of the Trudeau era are moving on.Carney got three dropping, so what does that say about him?
Read my edited responseThat the old guard of the Trudeau era are moving on.
What does it say about PP though?
Not that you care for videos from "the right", but have a watch and ruminate on itThat the old guard of the Trudeau era are moving on.
What does it say about PP though?
Another by election coming for september or October now
Eventually, but much more slowly. Children give governments about 17-30 years of lead time.
One can be concerned about birth rates without advocating for increased immigration. In fact, i wouod rather see more pro natalist policies being considered more than i want more immigration.
Carney got three dropping, so what does that say about him?
Why the snark? You immediately set people up negatively while trying to gain their consideration of Wagantall’s service as a Parliamemtarian. That doesn’t do her any favour.Not that you care for videos from "the right", but have a watch and ruminate on it
The "snark" was aimed at one individual who very specifically said in past post he does not care for post featuring videos from certain Youtubers and in particular, he has named Northern Perspective.Why the snark? You immediately set people up negatively while trying to gain their consideration of Wagantall’s service as a Parliamemtarian. That doesn’t do her any favour.
See, that was helpful.Read my edited response
As per usual.Not that you care for videos from "the right", but have a watch and ruminate on it
I agree, and think it will keep rolling, especially on work already in progress and things needed as part of the projected growth.I largely agree with you.
I think Canada is waking up to the fact that we need to fund our military. I think savings will be found elsewhere.
As it pertains to some provisions of Part 1 of the bill, it’s as hamfisted yet substantially correct now as it was when the CPC were saying the same thing in 2012.Hurry up and vote! If you don't support this you don't care about victims.
Minister says MPs must ‘choose’ victims by fast-tracking lawful access bill
![]()
Minister says MPs must ‘choose’ victims by fast-tracking lawful access bill - National | Globalnews.ca
Lawful access has raised privacy concerns, yet Gary Anandasangaree echoed Conservative Vic Toews who said in 2012 people 'can either stand with us or with the child pornographers.'globalnews.ca
I remember Harper pushing this stuff back then and not trusting him.As it pertains to some provisions of Part 1 of the bill, it’s as hamfisted yet substantially correct now as it was when the CPC were saying the same thing in 2012.
Uniparty at work.I remember Harper pushing this stuff back then and not trusting him.
Warrantless access concerns, Metadata expansion and surveillance scope, weak judicial oversight, data retention concerns, concerns effecting speech and internet use (I think anonymous whistle blowing being one).
Also recall backlash against Vic Toews basically framing it as
“You’re either with us or with child pornographers”, which Anandasangaree seems to be channeling with his "choose victims".