• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

12 Dec 05 Afghan landmine explosion injures 3 Cdn. soldiers

Heard on local radio that an internet site received posting claiming credit for the incident. States that IED was a bomb wrapped around a living torso..... Kamikaze style.
 
geo said:
Ah.... OK.... so the locals did "telegraph" knowledge that something was going down. Just too quickly for our boys to react to it. Oh well - these things do happen.

Noticing those signs that telegraph something is about to happen, is much easier when something actually does.
 
About the Lav ,  i understand they take out tanks and such , but i don't think they ( in afghanistan) will hit a hard target like a Lav. but time will time i guess! they still havn't seen our drills on the 25mm yet and its firpower and distance. Like i guess all of us going there will find out .
 
silentbutdeadly said:
About the Lav ,   i understand they take out tanks and such , but i don't think they ( in afghanistan) will hit a hard target like a Lav. but time will time i guess! they still havn't seen our drills on the 25mm yet and its firpower and distance. Like i guess all of us going there will find out .

Sgt pull your head outof the sand.  We had Coyote's here in 2002, and LAV's and 'yotes since 2003...  People watch.  When you get over to Afghan you'll see that the LAV is not the be all end all and for the most part is just a larger tgt.
 
On Athena 0, there were many times we saw "persons of interest" videotaping us in the LAV as we drove through Kabul. Of course we were directed to detain anyone like that but Im not about to dismount in crowds of thousands to run down a fellow with a camera. I am almost positive the talaban have thought long and hard about how to hit a lav but fortunately for us they havn't had the opportunity yet.
 
SHELLDRAKE!! said:
On Athena 0, there were many times we saw "persons of interest" videotaping us in the LAV as we drove through Kabul. Of course we were directed to detain anyone like that but Im not about to dismount in crowds of thousands to run down a fellow with a camera. I am almost positive the talaban have thought long and hard about how to hit a lav but fortunately for us they havn't had the opportunity yet.

Substitute desire...

A few LAV's on different Roto's have had close calls - either seeing IED's prior and backing off - or - Dumbluck Jay4th and a few others are aware of one specific.




 
silentbutdeadly said:
About the Lav ,   i understand they take out tanks and such , but i don't think they ( in afghanistan) will hit a hard target like a Lav. but time will time i guess! they still havn't seen our drills on the 25mm yet and its firpower and distance. Like i guess all of us going there will find out .

At the risk of being flamed me being a newb and all, if 'they' are taking out main battle tanks in Iraq I hazard to guess 'they' would have little reservation about carrying out an attack on a LAV in Afghan regardless of what u have mounted on the lid. Remember, 'they' have no fear of, or reservations about death like most of our troops and allies. Keep in mind 'they' are more than willing to strap a bomb on and sacrifice themselves, their wives, husbands, and no doubt their children to further their twisted ideology. I have no doubt in my mind, any weaknesses discovered by them will be exploited to the fullest of their ability.
AG.
 
Well, what about the Coyote that DID get hit by an IED in Kabul in sept?

http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/34639.0.html
 
RoKo -- precisely...

They can always make a bigger bang too -- an roadside IED may not have the OOMPH to bang up a yote or LAV other than the exposed crew -- but VBIED's can.

Look at some of the Russian ambush vids' and you will see them smoking T-72's, BTR's and BMP's -- the LAV and Coyote are not dismilar from those.  Some of the BTR's where blown into the air like 20-30 feet.

Down Jalalabad road outtowards Poli-Sharki (ANA Corps and Range Area) there was a bit of a boom early this month -- 30 min later a much larger VBIED one 300m from the intial as they tried to hit a QRF.

These people are sneeky, evil and they learn from their and our mistakes.


 
the insurgents in Iraq are far different then the ones in Afghanistan , so comparing them is a little hard to do and the tactics they use! the ones in Afghanistan are not in the business of using or killin women and children.
 
Partially correct -- the locals are typically as you say (but not all)

The Chechens, Pakistani's, Saudi's and all the others that are here have no such quams. 

I work for US DoS -- I got a pretty good ear to the ground for int.

 
KevinB said:
Down Jalalabad road outtowards Poli-Sharki (ANA Corps and Range Area) there was a bit of a boom early this month -- 30 min later a much larger VBIED one 300m from the intial as they tried to hit a QRF.

Heard about that when we were out at the FOB.

Always got a wierd feeling going out to the ranges....just a perfect site for an ambush/ IED.

Regards
 
As always once you get on ground you will quickly discern what was crap in DLOC / MS trg.

The guys down the road have the best info in Khandar since they are out kicking peoples ass all around it -- We have a few PSD teams down that way too, though they are down the road spawed guys too...

Best thing -- dont drive like DynCorp...

Were running low pro - but the specific targets we get int on are ISAF/OEF troops and the US Embassy (tgt #2 in the free world apparently - so I'm making my bucks...).

In The North West and Southern (Khandahar area) it is still the wild west -- as others have alluded to the Opium Erradication Programs that the US and UK are sponsoring are cutting into the Warlords income and prestige -- so they are ANGRY.

Some good jobs in country if you guys want to go private after TF1-06...  ;)
As I told Jay...

I'll PM you

Cheers --


 
Dude your only going to contribute to the personal shortage in the CF with talk like that.
 
http://thechronicleherald.ca/Canada/471722.html

Military releases names of soldiers injured by bomb in Afghanistan



A soldier from Quebec and another from British Columbia have been identified as the Canadians injured in a roadside bomb attack in Afghanistan earlier this week, a military spokesman said Thursday.

Capt. Manuel Panchana-Moya, 26, is from Montreal and Pte. Ryan Crawford, 21, comes from Kelowna.

Both are based in Edmonton with the 3rd Battalion of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry.

The bomb went off as the Canadians patrolled in a lightly armoured vehicle about 90 kilometres west of Kandahar on Monday.

Panchana-Moya's leg was broken in the attack, while Crawford suffered a broken ankle and foot. Another soldier and a journalist received minor injuries.

The injured soldiers were flown back to Edmonton on Tuesday after being attended to in a military hospital in Ramstein, Germany.

Military officials had called media outlets Thursday to arrange interviews with the injured men, who are still in hospital, but later cancelled them because doctors decided the soldiers weren't yet up to the strain.

"They're in surgery for their injuries and will be recovering over the weekend," said Brian Hillier, a former captain who is now a civilian with Edmonton-based Land Force Western Area.

Hillier said the interviews may take place next week if the men are feeling better.

Canadian military officials said the bomb blast is being investigated by a group that includes American specialists to determine what sort of explosive was used and how it detonated.

Canada has about 250 soldiers running a provincial reconstruction team based in Kandahar.
 
i was under the assumption that the soldiers asked for there names not to be printed? i guess that didn't work out to well!
 
silentbutdeadly said:
i was under the assumption that the soldiers asked for there names not to be printed? i guess that didn't work out to well!

SBD,

Those soldiers are members of my unit.   They were asked, and consented to have their names released to the media.

Sarcasm and cynisim are all well and good - where WARRANTED.   But when someone indulges in either "attitude" lacking the experiential background or facts to be credible?   Well, then he (or she) simply tends to come off as an arse-clown.

Welcome to the 3-ring circus.   Give your big red nose a squeeze.   "Beep, Beep!"

::)

My advice for the future would be to know exactly what the heck you are blabbing about before inserting your foot firmly in your gob.

FWIW
 
Hmmmm

Assume:
as in "making an Ass out of you & me"

doesn't pay SBD
 
silentbutdeadly said:
i was under the assumption that the soldiers asked for there names not to be printed? i guess that didn't work out to well!

You assumption is backward. In issues of medical confidentiality, privacy is guaranteed.  They must consent to have their names and any other information released. In fact, I believe consent must even be given for media to film them, as was done on thier arrival, coming off the plane into Edmonton.
 
Back
Top