• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

Behind a paywall. It’s written by a former diplomat who has been highly critical of Beijing and our chumminess with them. He’s basically saying that Trump is doing the United Front’s job for them.

 
Good point, often overlooked.

Nuclear on the other hand is a very reliable surce of energy...

Hydro is no different than any other energy source we have. It's only as viable as the amount of base product to produce it. No water, no hydro.

However, uranium we have. We need generating reactors to use it. Lots of them. Both big ones, like Pickering, and hundreds of SMRs for cities and towns. True green energy with zero emissions (minus extraction and refining). Much much better than solar panels and windmills.
 
Let's see how the SCC and the GG handle the prorogue situation when they get to it. Hopefully soon.

Just on that- the Attorney General’s respondent submission to federal court was due today at noon. The oral hearing is scheduled for next Thursday and Friday, and there’s a due date of Feb 18 for replies by the parties to the approved intervenors. From that point, Federal Court will be in a position to rule.

Next step would be Federal Court of Appeal (I expect whichever side loses at FC will definitely at least try to appeal) before eventually SCC if the latter gave leave to appeal an FCA decision. Realistically, this will likely stretch at least somewhat into March regardless. I would be surprised if we were to see the prorogue shortened by the courts.
 
So Trudeau says ""Donald Trump wants to annex Canada to gain access to its critical minerals.." (CBC article dated Today Feb 7)

What a really dumb F-ing thing to say. He is STILL the leader of this country for a few weeks and in my mind, him saying that could agitate Trump on to retaliate. Its one thing for other people to say it but Trudeau is still the man in the chair (removed by moderator). Lets see if this pokes the bear
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Trudeau says ""Donald Trump wants to annex Canada to gain access to its critical minerals.." (CBC article dated Today Feb 7)

What a really dumb F-ing thing to say. He is STILL the leader of this country for a few weeks and in my mind, him saying that could agitate Trump on to retaliate. Its one thing for other people to say it but Trudeau is still the man in the chair (assuming he identifies as a man). Lets see if this pokes the bear
Was it this hot mic moment?


To be fair Trump has been belching that out for a while and still is.
 
So Trudeau says ""Donald Trump wants to annex Canada to gain access to its critical minerals.." (CBC article dated Today Feb 7)

What a really dumb F-ing thing to say. He is STILL the leader of this country for a few weeks and in my mind, him saying that could agitate Trump on to retaliate. Its one thing for other people to say it but Trudeau is still the man in the chair (removed). Lets see if this pokes the bear

Is he though? I think he's already abdicated to Carney. Right up to the day of the leadership vote. He'll smile, hold Carney's hand up, give a fiery anti Trump retirement speech and slink off into whatever pool of swampwater he has picked to remove him from the public view.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau bought a pipeline in 2018, and then pushed through the building of the Trans Mountain Expansion project. For that, he deserves credit and thanks. It’s one of the most significant economic accomplishments of his time in office. It will pay dividends to our economy for decades to come.

But you’ll never hear his government or his party crowing about it. Nope.

How could they? TMX is (sigh) an oil pipeline. And the Trudeau government acts like there’s an omertà on that word: oil. In the Liberal style guide, it’s a four-letter word. Ministers and the PM try to avoid using it in polite company. Like other swear words, it only comes out under duress.

But under the duress of U.S. President Donald Trump’s threats, oil is suddenly being talked about, loudly and often. We are being forced to see things as they are, and to call them by their names.

Canada is not an “energy superpower” that exports lots of “energy” – these being the Trudeau government’s preferred euphemisms. We produce and export massive amounts of oil. We are on oil superpower. Oil, oil, oil.

We’re the world’s fourth-largest producer of oil, out-pumping every country in the Middle East save Saudi Arabia. Canada is also the world’s fifth largest producer of natural gas, ahead of all in the Mideast except Iran.

In 2023, Canada exported $192-billion worth of “energy” – $4-billion of electricity and $134-billion of crude oil and bitumen, plus another $54-billion worth of natural gas, coal and refined oil.

1. Ottawa should finance one (or more) new pipelines: The Trudeau government did the right thing sinking public money into building TMX. Despite significant cost overruns, the project is already an economic winner. It makes it possible to ship 890,000 barrels a day to where oil prices are higher, beyond the U.S.

Last April, the Bank of Canada estimated that the new pipeline would add a quarter percentage point to Canadian economic growth.

A careful analysis will be needed to determine which pipeline (or pipelines) should get federal backing. Maybe the best course is reviving Northern Gateway to the Pacific. Or Energy East to the Atlantic. Maybe there are other options.

But the necessity of doing something, and of federal financial muscle to get it done, is the same as the case for building the Canadian Pacific Railway in the late 19th century. Canada is in political peril if we allow the trade of our most important commodity to remain so dependent on the U.S.

And whereas building the CPR imposed economic costs – north-south trade was cheaper, but east-west trade was the price of nationhood – getting more oil and gas to tidewater is national insurance that will more than earn back its premiums, through higher prices.

1738954013558.png

Sir John A's National Policy.
 
They’re uh… going with “Canada First”, eh? Did they not google that one to check before they picked it? There’s some not great baggage with that label that their opponents in the election will be able to make hay with.

The opposition will make hay with whatever is available, true or not. We don't have recent examples, but a look south proves it. The democrats are going absolutely apoplectic over Trumps moves.

They are screaming and yelling, talking about fighting in the streets, making shit up to try gain attention. They are almost done as a party and it's the normal, entrenched old guard seeing their carreer at its end who are the most vocal and animated.

The keep screaming Musk wasn't elected, knowing full well he doesn't need to be. But it makes good TV.
 
Putting this onto the pile of chips - cost of entry into the US market?


Mr. Blair, speaking to reporters after visiting with U.S. lawmakers, said he doesn’t think Mr. Trump’s missile-defence shield should stop at the Canada-U.S. border.

“Frankly, an integrated missile-defence system for all of North America is the thing that makes sense to everybody,” Mr. Blair said.

Mr. Blair didn’t make a commitment to join but made clear in his comments Thursday that Canada should be part of the conversation.

Breaking Defense on "Iron Dome USA (NORAD?)"


...

It's late in the day, but it is movement in the right direction as far as I am concerned.
 
He has been talking half heartedly talking about annexing Canada. According to Trump, we have nothing the USA needs.

I think he's stayed away from talk of annexing or taking Canada for the most part. Any talk of annexing has the caveat of "if that's what Canadians want".
Trudeau has learned nothing about using his inflammatory speech, over nine years, to divide the nation. Now he's flipping and trying to use exactly the same style to try unite us. He's a lame duck. A has been. He engineered Carney’s seamless takeover and now nobody sees him as PM anymore. He's just a big, black, festering boil in Canada's history of destructive interlopers.
 

That doesn't appear to jive with the real numbers posted earlier.

 
So, the thinnest of hairs of movement on (at least some kind of) pipelines?
 
They may be different than other countries or not to the same extent, but, the US has restrictions or limitations on the movement of goods, services and labour between states. They just don't like other nations' protections. It is similar to the myth that their agricultural sector isn't subsidized.
Certain items within State purview can be restricted, and some states do have restrictions, so states even have restrictions on Federally Controlled items:
Alcohol is a good example, as some states do not allow alcohol to be mailed or otherwise be shipped to individuals. The require all alcohol to be acquired from state licensed establishments, as well as some states do not allow any form of online or mail order purchase (internal or external).

Now several protections/prohibitions have gone to the USSS and been overturned if that relates to a Federally controlled item, but for items not specifically called out as Federal - the States have the autonomy to do as they wish.
 
So, the thinnest of hairs of movement on (at least some kind of) pipelines?

Nope. Fuck 'em. Time for tough love. You'll take it all or we start withholding transfer payments from the O&G provinces that you get and bypass your depots in Montreal and Quebec City. They're a province, not a nation. About time they were reminded of that.
 
Back
Top