MCG said:
There is not a dollar value assigned to the concept of an FTE. I understand that cutting the Reg F establishment permanently would provide funds to increase PRes pay, but the Conservatives are not proposing that we adopt a USMC model to replace the current PRes. Are you proposing that we shrink the Reg F to pay more reservists to achieve the Conservatives' promise?
No. I am asking how much it would cost to fund the PRes of 24,000(32,000) on the same contractual basis as the USMC Reserves (which closely mirrors the US Army Reserves and the National Guard, not to mention the Swedish Home Guard).
Nor am I suggesting replacing the PRes with a different system. I am suggesting that a different contractual model be considered.
Beyond the initial 10 to 12 week Basic Training requirement I don't see a lot of difference between the Annual Drill expectation of a US Marine Reservist and a Canadian Forces Reservist. The difference is measured in days, not weeks and certainly not months.
Apparently the PRes exists as an entity. There has to be a cost associated with it - both the administrative cost and the cost of paying the individuals when they are training (drilling, parading, camping - choose your euphemism).
There is an implicit intention that the PRes will be a pool of usable bodies that fill slots in the Defence Establishment as and when needed.
It seems to me that some of those slots can be filled by Regular Force people that collect a salary for 365 day a year service, or they can be filled by "others" on short term contracts of 2 days, 2 weeks or 2 months. When they are not working they are not paid.
A large pool of Reservists (unpaid but willing) means that it is more likely that you will find somebody available to fill a slot than if you only have a small pool.
The issue is how do you get the pool of Reservists and what skills should they have.
Other forces seem to have got the game figured out - Their forces are complex mixes of capabilities with only some portion of the force being fully manned by high readiness personnel.
The CF, or at least the CA, has been struggling with that for as long as I have known them. Total Force has never achieved fruition.
Perhaps the system can start with offering all candidates for both the PRes and the Regs the same Basic Training programme and then having them diverge after the course is over.
One 11 week summer job, or even a single 11 week sabbatical from a job, once in a career is not an impossibility.