- Reaction score
- 12,619
- Points
- 1,160
Yeah, smaller pool paying for ever increasing services and whatnot.
Or in this scenario, the bill for food comes due and everyone needs to pay more because that one person left.
But we as Canadians decided that the LPC was bringing in way too many immigrants and throwing a bunch of other sectors out of whack so now we are actively shrinking. That comes with its own set of consequences but thats what we all collectively wanted, no?
Not so fast.
The problem with your analogy here is that you're assuming the only variable is the number of people in the room. If the room was already overcrowded and the rent, food, and utilities were rising faster than incomes, adding more people doesn't automatically make everyone better off.
Also we didn't collectively decide to shrink the country. Many people wanted immigration levels reduced because housing, healthcare, and infrastructure weren't keeping pace with population growth. Slower growth may have economic costs, but so did the previous approach.
And we're still growing even with reduced immigration.
Certain diaspora of people coming in are bringing a lot of crime, death, and carnage.
