- Reaction score
- 7,434
- Points
- 1,260
What a crock.Kids are dying': Miller says online harms legislation a government priority
Won't someone think of the children?!
-Helen Lovejoy

What a crock.Kids are dying': Miller says online harms legislation a government priority
Won't someone think of the children?!
-Helen Lovejoy
Kids are dying': Miller says online harms legislation a government priority
Won't someone think of the children?!
-Helen Lovejoy
No he’s not. This has been covered in the ‘exploiting/radicalizing youth’ thread.What the hell is Marc Miller yammering about? He is making up shit to sell a bad bill.
And the Liberal defenders come in at 3..2..

Is that the bill to keep social media from those under 16 ?
While I personally think this legislation is useless, drinking ages exist in this country despite there being multiple ways to circumvent it.The legislation is aimed at that, I think it's separate from the actual online harms act bill.
The first thing I noticed is "there will be exceptions", so we'll see how effective it actually is.
One concern people have is the Liberal government using this as a cover to push ID verification for adults.
Australia has an under 16 ban (where the platforms are held accountable) and they do it without strict ID verification. It also sounds like the majority of kids can circumvent the age verification anyways and it's not very effective.
While I personally think this legislation is useless, drinking ages exist in this country despite there being multiple ways to circumvent it.
Just because something can be circumvented does not inherently make it not worthwhile to do.
VPNs exist for a reason. Canada? Nah mate, i live in Mexico, rules dont apply.Would you be comfortable sending the mods a copy of your government ID to post here?
Sounds like more and more VPN companies are gearing up to abandon Canada if the government goes through with Bill C-22.VPNs exist for a reason. Canada? Nah mate, i live in Mexico, rules dont apply.
things to navigate for sure, but I'll save my indignation for when I see the text of the bill.Sounds like more and more VPN companies are gearing up to abandon Canada if the government goes through with Bill C-22.
![]()
Major VPN provider says it could leave Canada over lawful access bill
Virtual private network service NordVPN says it could pull out of Canada over the federal government’s proposed lawful access bill.www.ctvnews.ca
It's also all too easy for websites to deny access to users using VPN's.
things to navigate for sure, but I'll save my indignation for when I see the text of the bill.
When I can't figure out something on my computer I ask my grandkids. Even the 9 year old is able to help grandpa so I doubt short of developing foolproof digital id they will be able to keep any teen that wants on them away from the web sites. I wish it were otherwiseThe legislation is aimed at that, I think it's separate from the actual online harms act bill.
The first thing I noticed is "there will be exceptions", so we'll see how effective it actually is.
One concern people have is the Liberal government using this as a cover to push ID verification for adults.
Australia has an under 16 ban (where the platforms are held accountable) and they do it without strict ID verification. It also sounds like the majority of kids can circumvent the age verification anyways and it's not very effective.
No offence intended but the parents at this point (mainly millennials) are the most digitally literate generation we have. Most children and teens aren’t nearly as literate on computers (computer literacy is actually measured as going down because schools stopped teaching it and smartphones/tablets are app based instead of showing the details behind it all).When I can't figure out something on my computer I ask my grandkids. Even the 9 year old is able to help grandpa so I doubt short of developing foolproof digital id they will be able to keep any teen that wants on them away from the web sites. I wish it were otherwise
Sadly, and reality, is that there will always be ways to circumvent a rule.The legislation is aimed at that, I think it's separate from the actual online harms act bill.
The first thing I noticed is "there will be exceptions", so we'll see how effective it actually is.
One concern people have is the Liberal government using this as a cover to push ID verification for adults.
Australia has an under 16 ban (where the platforms are held accountable) and they do it without strict ID verification. It also sounds like the majority of kids can circumvent the age verification anyways and it's not very effective.
The legislation is aimed at that, I think it's separate from the actual online harms act bill.
The first thing I noticed is "there will be exceptions", so we'll see how effective it actually is.
One concern people have is the Liberal government using this as a cover to push ID verification for adults.
Australia has an under 16 ban (where the platforms are held accountable) and they do it without strict ID verification. It also sounds like the majority of kids can circumvent the age verification anyways and it's not very effective.
When my kids were younger had a device called - Circle - that we used to control/monitor their internet access. It's a great device and does a solid job on restricting access to sites/apps and for access to the internet. If her device(s) doesn't have a 'data package' but only wifi, this tool could be used to device usage and such.We've recently had a state of the family address about social media and device usage. I was fed up and said things need to change or the devices all become targets for me at the range.
And my daughter actually agreed it's too much and agrees with cutting back drastically. She's just turned 13.