- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
Jim Seggie said:We have the military that Canada, particularly that some politicians and "peaceniks" want:
Toothless and emasculated.
Rant over.
Well said.
Jim Seggie said:We have the military that Canada, particularly that some politicians and "peaceniks" want:
Toothless and emasculated.
Rant over.
Jed said:Well said.
[/quote
Chief Stoker said:Perhaps we should be taking some of the extra cash being generated from the increased alcohol sales and but it towards port activities, tours etc. Give the sailors something to do if they choose.
a Sig Op said:Sounds like a great idea.
My current employer has a quite firm zero tolerance drug and alcohol policy, we were recently in a shipyard, with fairly free and easy access to alcohol which remained prohibited...
Rather than rely on punitive measures, the employer was fairly proactive, spending a bit of their social budget on diversionary activities... it all worked out quite while... I can't say no one consumed alcohol, but there were no issues with drunkenness, and any of the fighting and other nonsense associated with it...
a Sig Op said:Sounds like a great idea.
My current employer has a quite firm zero tolerance drug and alcohol policy, we were recently in a shipyard, with fairly free and easy access to alcohol which remained prohibited...
Rather than rely on punitive measures, the employer was fairly proactive, spending a bit of their social budget on diversionary activities... it all worked out quite while... I can't say no one consumed alcohol, but there were no issues with drunkenness, and any of the fighting and other nonsense associated with it...
Scott said:To be perfectly clear before I make this statement, I always treated this issue of booze on the boats with indifference.
Now that it's blown up its rather simple, we are speaking about alcohol in a workplace. Think about that. How many other workplaces have this?
Scott said:To be perfectly clear before I make this statement, I always treated this issue of booze on the boats with indifference.
Now that it's blown up its rather simple, we are speaking about alcohol in a workplace. Think about that. How many other workplaces have this?
RoyalDrew said:I, very regularly, have a drink with lunch during working hours. The health benefits of drinking a beer or a glass wine during the day are well documented. It's sad that the American villainization of alcohol has crept into our military.
Chief Stoker said:Yes Scott but how many workplaces confine hundreds of people in a metal box, a couple of hundred feet long for months on end. I don't drink at sea, but I respect their desire to have a beer after watch as long as its 6 hrs from going on watch.
Scott said:Good for you. Do you work on a vessel at sea? Do you have emergency duties?
Again, how many workplaces, outside of the military, would allow drinking while at work? This isn't villi animation of booze, it's common sense. Booze and work don't mesh well. In fact, alcohol doesn't even factor into any risk assessment matrix I have ever seen, and I wonder why that is.
Chief, I work offshore. You don't have to explain the hardships to me. Granted, I don't do stretches of months at a time, but I do know how limited the options are for fun. We do not have booze. I cannot imagine having it. I have also experienced emergencies at sea during my hitch and I wouldn't want to have Lloyds Register having to ask if anyone had been drinking. It just doesn't compute. At all.
Absolutely. I took the Alcohol, gambling, other drugs course PSP offers a year or so ago, and the whole course for into a fairly heated debate with the base addictions councilor on how alcohol is a fast track out of the CF now, but if you're doing oxys in your shacks they'll put you through years of rehab. Instead of encouraging responsible use (and correcting those that abuse), we've taken the 1920s approach and painted everyone like an alcoholic that wants to go to TGIT at the mess.RoyalDrew said:I, very regularly, have a drink with lunch during working hours. The health benefits of drinking a beer or a glass wine during the day are well documented. It's sad that the American villainization of alcohol has crept into our military.
Chief Stoker said:Yes Scott I do and I have to be ready at a moments notice to rush into a fire, in fact I have more time at sea than most reservists. I don't drink at sea because of that of my position. If we had to look at it and compare it to the civilian side, then yes no drinking at sea would be order. Perhaps if we never had it to begin with, but as you might imagine good or bad this is part of our tradition and culture. Change is hard.
Scott said:Chief, I work offshore. You don't have to explain the hardships to me. Granted, I don't do stretches of months at a time, but I do know how limited the options are for fun. We do not have booze. I cannot imagine having it.
Scott said:Good for you. Do you work on a vessel at sea? Do you have emergency duties?
Again, how many workplaces, outside of the military, would allow drinking while at work? This isn't villianization of booze, it's common sense. Booze and work don't mesh well. In fact, alcohol doesn't even factor into any risk assessment matrix I have ever seen, and I wonder why that is.
Chief, I work offshore. You don't have to explain the hardships to me. Granted, I don't do stretches of months at a time, but I do know how limited the options are for fun. We do not have booze. I cannot imagine having it.
Edited to insert quotes and remove a disjointed ramble.
Jarnhamar said:How long are your shifts off shore?
RoyalDrew said:Smokey Smith won the Victoria Cross while on the piss so maybe we should start to take alcohol into consideration when conducting s risk assessment but I digress. I am talking about drinking "a beer" or "a glass of wine" which has been shown to lower heart rate and blood pressure and have a calming effect on the nerves.
You seem to be talking about something completely different, i.e. Crushing a 12 pack, which I agree is completely unacceptable. Your above comments only further validated my previous comments about the American villainization of alcohol that now pervades our military.
Scott said:14 days.
I don't know where you get that I am furthering this so-called villianization of booze, but if you want to read that into my comments then give 'er. I like to drink as much as the next guy, I just know that it doesn't belong in certain place: like cars, the workplace, cockpits, etc.
You really want to compare Smokey Smith's actions to the modern workplace? That's weak.
The difficulty is how the line is drawn. I can admit being conflicted in that I don't have much of an issue with soldiers having a beer in the field during downtime. On the other hand, every sailor I've ever spoken to has told me that fire at sea is their greatest fear - and I repeat, the aftermath would ******* suck if I had to explain that one of the ER guys had a beer. It's just a question that doesn't have to come up. Does this make me a hypocrite, maybe. But I can rationalize it pretty easy in that the dude working on base in an office type setting doesn't have the inherent risk that someone at sea does, nor does he have the ER roles.
Chief Stoker said:Scott I'm also the Safety O and Enviro O on the ship as well. Like it has been already said life aboard a civilian vessel is vastly different than a military one. I guess its all about what sort of risk you are willing to assume. I will guarantee that aboard the Protecteur and the Kootenay someone was having a drink. I do appreciate your position. If we are to make life at sea just like the civilian work, we might as well join the merchant marine.