Well honestly we never have been great at toeing the party line. Thank fuck.Shows how you misjudge the Infantry.
The Vandoos are wondering what it can be sold for.
The Royals are debating painting it
The PPCLI are waiting to see what the other two do, so they can do something different…
The PPCLI were private military contractors before it was coolWell honestly we never have been great at toeing the party line. Thank fuck.
I'll buy a lifetime supply of whatever they drink if someone in Army G1 tosses the kilts out completely and just makes everyone wear pants.Was looking over those slides this afternoon. It looks sharp, and from what I can tell from the CADCC RoD, the decision on Forage, Service, and Beret is something each specific corps will hammer out.
My educated guess based on some of the implied rumblings:
-Forage Cap will be a game time decision for individual Corps/Regiments. I believe the RRCA is leading the charge on this one, however, I am curious what the rest of the Corps fell toward this initiative; in that the Armoured Corps will ignore the initiative and go with Berets regardless and the 3 Reg F infantry Regiments seem to be apathetic to the whole thing.
-Peaked Service Cap is only for No 3 Dress (Ribbons, no Sam Browne or White belt), so my assumption is that it would be an optional item, either kitted out at initial issue and then purchased for replacements, or bought through Logistik Unicorps.
- Berets are the default that everyone keeps circling back to. There seems to be an understanding that everyone that has a distinct beret will keep wearing it with this new Service Dress, but that makes things weird for everyone else pushing for the Forage Cap option.
-Kilted folks will continue to be the anomaly with what they put on their head, and no one in Army G1 wants to touch that with a 10 ft caber.
As the CCA has signed his approval to the design and wearing of the uniform as per the slide show, I am happy this is moving from "concept" to "kit out complete date established" within a year and a half.
No, I just think they look ridiculous.
Then again, I don't think I've ever met a gunner with any fashion sense, so it checks out.
Maybe the navy needs to trial a uniform that is mixture of square rig and fore and aft.
View attachment 93848
Funny on the RCAC point, last I heard it'll be up to the Regiments to determine the quirks of their uniforms, hats included. Did this change recently?Was looking over those slides this afternoon. It looks sharp, and from what I can tell from the CADCC RoD, the decision on Forage, Service, and Beret is something each specific corps will hammer out.
My educated guess based on some of the implied rumblings:
-Forage Cap will be a game time decision for individual Corps/Regiments. I believe the RRCA is leading the charge on this one, however, I am curious what the rest of the Corps fell toward this initiative; in that the Armoured Corps will ignore the initiative and go with Berets regardless and the 3 Reg F infantry Regiments seem to be apathetic to the whole thing.
-Peaked Service Cap is only for No 3 Dress (Ribbons, no Sam Browne or White belt), so my assumption is that it would be an optional item, either kitted out at initial issue and then purchased for replacements, or bought through Logistik Unicorps.
- Berets are the default that everyone keeps circling back to. There seems to be an understanding that everyone that has a distinct beret will keep wearing it with this new Service Dress, but that makes things weird for everyone else pushing for the Forage Cap option.
-Kilted folks will continue to be the anomaly with what they put on their head, and no one in Army G1 wants to touch that with a 10 ft caber.
As the CCA has signed his approval to the design and wearing of the uniform as per the slide show, I am happy this is moving from "concept" to "kit out complete date established" within a year and a half.
This was just my WAG from deciphering the CADCC minutes.Funny on the RCAC point, last I heard it'll be up to the Regiments to determine the quirks of their uniforms, hats included. Did this change recently?
Also is it just me or is the Officer footwear brown (like belt and gloves) and the NCM footwear black?
Seems like astupidBritish differentiation.
On a very recent battlefield tour the owner, who was the tour conductor, said the reason the PPCLI were in this particular battle was because they were Militia!The PPCLI were private military contractors before it was cool. Being "unique" is part of it's heritage and identity.
To be fair, it's going to be a lot cheaper to change the Scottish regiments over to the new uniform, it's a jacket shirt and tie.I'll buy a lifetime supply of whatever they drink if someone in Army G1 tosses the kilts out completely and just makes everyone wear pants.
I'll put their kids through college if they make all the infantry wear the same cap badge, though that one's just for shits and giggles.
Jackets all need to be specifically tailored to wear with a kilt.To be fair, it's going to be a lot cheaper to change the Scottish regiments over to the new uniform, it's a jacket shirt and tie.
... except they have specific doublet cuts in the system for kilted regiments...Jackets all need to be specifically tailored to wear with a kilt.
The Patricias were privately raised by Hamilton Gault who put up $100,000 at the time. The Orignals consisted of 1049 all ranks - the majority of them had served in other armies.On a very recent battlefield tour the owner, who was the tour conductor, said the reason the PPCLI were in this particular battle was because they were Militia!
I attempted to correct him, but being an arrogant Brit, he just cut me off and ignored me.