• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Updated Army Service Dress project

Fashion sense? - That's for kilted units. A gunner's role is to add dignity through hats.

9774905_7b9f863b43_z.jpg


:cool:
 
Shows how you misjudge the Infantry.

The Vandoos are wondering what it can be sold for.
The Royals are debating painting it

The PPCLI are waiting to see what the other two do, so they can do something different…
Well honestly we never have been great at toeing the party line. Thank fuck.
 
Was looking over those slides this afternoon. It looks sharp, and from what I can tell from the CADCC RoD, the decision on Forage, Service, and Beret is something each specific corps will hammer out.

My educated guess based on some of the implied rumblings:

-Forage Cap will be a game time decision for individual Corps/Regiments. I believe the RRCA is leading the charge on this one, however, I am curious what the rest of the Corps fell toward this initiative; in that the Armoured Corps will ignore the initiative and go with Berets regardless and the 3 Reg F infantry Regiments seem to be apathetic to the whole thing.

-Peaked Service Cap is only for No 3 Dress (Ribbons, no Sam Browne or White belt), so my assumption is that it would be an optional item, either kitted out at initial issue and then purchased for replacements, or bought through Logistik Unicorps.

- Berets are the default that everyone keeps circling back to. There seems to be an understanding that everyone that has a distinct beret will keep wearing it with this new Service Dress, but that makes things weird for everyone else pushing for the Forage Cap option.

-Kilted folks will continue to be the anomaly with what they put on their head, and no one in Army G1 wants to touch that with a 10 ft caber.

As the CCA has signed his approval to the design and wearing of the uniform as per the slide show, I am happy this is moving from "concept" to "kit out complete date established" within a year and a half.
I'll buy a lifetime supply of whatever they drink if someone in Army G1 tosses the kilts out completely and just makes everyone wear pants.

I'll put their kids through college if they make all the infantry wear the same cap badge, though that one's just for shits and giggles.
 
Was looking over those slides this afternoon. It looks sharp, and from what I can tell from the CADCC RoD, the decision on Forage, Service, and Beret is something each specific corps will hammer out.

My educated guess based on some of the implied rumblings:

-Forage Cap will be a game time decision for individual Corps/Regiments. I believe the RRCA is leading the charge on this one, however, I am curious what the rest of the Corps fell toward this initiative; in that the Armoured Corps will ignore the initiative and go with Berets regardless and the 3 Reg F infantry Regiments seem to be apathetic to the whole thing.

-Peaked Service Cap is only for No 3 Dress (Ribbons, no Sam Browne or White belt), so my assumption is that it would be an optional item, either kitted out at initial issue and then purchased for replacements, or bought through Logistik Unicorps.

- Berets are the default that everyone keeps circling back to. There seems to be an understanding that everyone that has a distinct beret will keep wearing it with this new Service Dress, but that makes things weird for everyone else pushing for the Forage Cap option.

-Kilted folks will continue to be the anomaly with what they put on their head, and no one in Army G1 wants to touch that with a 10 ft caber.

As the CCA has signed his approval to the design and wearing of the uniform as per the slide show, I am happy this is moving from "concept" to "kit out complete date established" within a year and a half.
Funny on the RCAC point, last I heard it'll be up to the Regiments to determine the quirks of their uniforms, hats included. Did this change recently?
 
Funny on the RCAC point, last I heard it'll be up to the Regiments to determine the quirks of their uniforms, hats included. Did this change recently?
This was just my WAG from deciphering the CADCC minutes.

I believe it is still up to individual Regiments and Corps to decide, however, who pays for it and if its part of the larger project... that is still unclear
 
Also is it just me or is the Officer footwear brown (like belt and gloves) and the NCM footwear black?

Seems like a stupid British differentiation.

FTFY.

That's the standard in the British Army, so we know that OP COPYCAT is getting it right, all the way down to the Sam Browne etc.

Upside? I have a pair of highly polished brown shoes I will never, ever wear again.
 
The PPCLI were private military contractors before it was cool 😎. Being "unique" is part of it's heritage and identity.
On a very recent battlefield tour the owner, who was the tour conductor, said the reason the PPCLI were in this particular battle was because they were Militia!

I attempted to correct him, but being an arrogant Brit, he just cut me off and ignored me.

After our tour he was running a tour for the CF Staff Collage.

Worst tour I have been on.
 
I'll buy a lifetime supply of whatever they drink if someone in Army G1 tosses the kilts out completely and just makes everyone wear pants.

I'll put their kids through college if they make all the infantry wear the same cap badge, though that one's just for shits and giggles.
To be fair, it's going to be a lot cheaper to change the Scottish regiments over to the new uniform, it's a jacket shirt and tie.
 
On a very recent battlefield tour the owner, who was the tour conductor, said the reason the PPCLI were in this particular battle was because they were Militia!

I attempted to correct him, but being an arrogant Brit, he just cut me off and ignored me.
The Patricias were privately raised by Hamilton Gault who put up $100,000 at the time. The Orignals consisted of 1049 all ranks - the majority of them had served in other armies.
Militia? Bah
 
Back
Top